Communications
club_cafe
HelpRegister
Replace a Partnership Agreement
We have amended our PA many times by adding addendum to the
bottom of the original document wit a reference to the
addendum in the text line that has been changed. We are to
the point of mas confusion. Is it acceptable to just start
over by including all the changes with a reference that this
new document is a complete replacement of the original with
all it's various addendum?
I certainly hope that it’s OK, and I believe it is because the original documents usually contain a provision allowing amendments. One of my clubs had made several such changes that last year we decided to completely incorporate the addendums and then we changed what was no longer needed/wanted. We ended up with a much nicer product, and we unanimously voted to approve the final product.

Roy Chastain
“We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give.” (Ronald Reagan, 8/8/1992)

On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Martin Eckerle <bmeckerle@comcast.net> wrote:

> We have amended our PA many times by adding addendum to the
> bottom of the original document wit a reference to the
> addendum in the text line that has been changed. We are to
> the point of mas confusion. Is it acceptable to just start
> over by including all the changes with a reference that this
> new document is a complete replacement of the original with
> all it's various addendum?
Simply call the new document Revision 1.

Denny McCarthy


From: "Roy Chastain" <roy12@me.com>
To: "club cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:54:22 AM
Subject: Re: [club_cafe] Replace a Partnership Agreement

I certainly hope that it's OK, and I believe it is because the original documents usually contain a provision allowing amendments.  One of my clubs had made several such changes that last year we decided to completely incorporate the addendums and then we changed what was no longer needed/wanted.  We ended up with a much nicer product, and we unanimously voted to approve the final product.

Roy Chastain
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give."  (Ronald Reagan, 8/8/1992)

On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Martin Eckerle <bmeckerle@comcast.net> wrote:

> We have amended our PA many times by adding addendum to the
> bottom of the original document wit a reference to the
> addendum in the text line that has been changed.  We are to
> the point of mas confusion.  Is it acceptable to just start
> over by including all the changes with a reference that this
> new document is a complete replacement of the original with
> all it's various addendum?


I would also note in the your Club's latest Meeting minutes that the Agreement was completely redone to a standalone Revision 1.


From: "dennymccarthy" <dennymccarthy@comcast.net>
To: "club cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 7:32:26 PM
Subject: Re: [club_cafe] Replace a Partnership Agreement

Simply call the new document Revision 1.

Denny McCarthy


From: "Roy Chastain" <roy12@me.com>
To: "club cafe" <club_cafe@bivio.com>
Sent: Wednesday, August 31, 2016 11:54:22 AM
Subject: Re: [club_cafe] Replace a Partnership Agreement

I certainly hope that it's OK, and I believe it is because the original documents usually contain a provision allowing amendments.  One of my clubs had made several such changes that last year we decided to completely incorporate the addendums and then we changed what was no longer needed/wanted.  We ended up with a much nicer product, and we unanimously voted to approve the final product.

Roy Chastain
"We make a living by what we get, we make a life by what we give."  (Ronald Reagan, 8/8/1992)

On Aug 31, 2016, at 8:36 AM, Martin Eckerle <bmeckerle@comcast.net> wrote:

> We have amended our PA many times by adding addendum to the
> bottom of the original document wit a reference to the
> addendum in the text line that has been changed.  We are to
> the point of mas confusion.  Is it acceptable to just start
> over by including all the changes with a reference that this
> new document is a complete replacement of the original with
> all it's various addendum?