Communications
club_cafe
HelpRegister
Another Club closing question
Our club is now discussing the order and process for
closing. One Bivio member suggested withdrawing several
members at a time. If we do this, is there a reason why the
treasurer would have to be the last withdrawal?
Barbara:

At the end of a partnership's life, there needs to be at
least two partners (it is no longer a partnership if there
is only one person), and one or more partners capable of: 1.
authorizing the broker to transfer stock and to sign checks
disbursing cash, 2. Have access to bivio to access
accounting records and the tax preparation software, 3. able
to prepare the minutes of the final meeting documenting the
vote to dissolve the partnership, and 4. capable and willing
to prepare the final federal and state tax returns, and any
notice to the state that the partnership is dissolved (if
required by the state where the partnership is resident).
Whether these tasks are assigned to one partner or several
and what their titles are is not significant. Although to
avoid questions, I would have one of the partners be called
President and one called Secretary-Treasurer.

If the partner currently called "Treasurer" performs some of
these tasks and wants out earlier than the final
dissolution, then another partner will need to take
responsibility for these tasks. If the partner currently
performing these tasks is willing to continue doing them
after becoming a non-partner, then whether that is permitted
falls under the adage "You can delegate tasks but not
responsibility." So, I see no reason a former partner could
not "assist" a partner with the planning and preparation of
dissolution documents and tax returns so long as the partner
is the one who officially executes the actions.

Based on the usual size of an investment club, I don't
believe performing the full withdrawal of all partners at
once is that burdensome. However, when the withdrawals are
in the latter part of the year, I would plan a final shut
down about 15-20 December so I will receive the 1099s from
the broker before the Partnership tax return is due. But if
some partners want out sooner, I would complete their final
withdrawal in accordance with the timing in your partnership
agreement. However, I would make a deal with at least one
partner to remain until December so the two of us still
constitute a partnership.

I am sure lots of clubs have shut down during the year and
filled a short-year final tax return without issues, so
waiting for December is just me when there have been many
transactions and there is the possibility for disbursements
to shareholders to be reclassified from non-qualified to
qualified dividends or to return of capital if the company
has insufficient income to treat the disbursement as a
dividend. Having the 1099s in hand when completing the tax
returns just reduces the chances of having to file amended
returns.

Cheers, Jack
Before you file your final tax return, you need to make sure all interest and dividends are included. You need that for accurate payout numbers.  It is possible that by waiting until December, you may receive dividends in 2026. They will not be reported on your 2025 tax return. How will you handle this. Will you need to pay for another year of Bivio for the tax program?


On Sat, Jul 19, 2025 at 8:26 PM, John W Ranby Trustee PGM Cariboo Trust via bivio.com
<user*15792700001@bivio.com> wrote:
Barbara:

At the end of a partnership's life, there needs to be at
least two partners (it is no longer a partnership if there
is only one person), and one or more partners capable of: 1.
authorizing the broker to transfer stock and to sign checks
disbursing cash, 2. Have access to bivio to access
accounting records and the tax preparation software, 3. able
to prepare the minutes of the final meeting documenting the
vote to dissolve the partnership, and 4. capable and willing
to prepare the final federal and state tax returns, and any
notice to the state that the partnership is dissolved (if
required by the state where the partnership is resident).
Whether these tasks are assigned to one partner or several
and what their titles are is not significant. Although to
avoid questions, I would have one of the partners be called
President and one called Secretary-Treasurer.

If the partner currently called "Treasurer" performs some of
these tasks and wants out earlier than the final
dissolution, then another partner will need to take
responsibility for these tasks. If the partner currently
performing these tasks is willing to continue doing them
after becoming a non-partner, then whether that is permitted
falls under the adage "You can delegate tasks but not
responsibility." So, I see no reason a former partner could
not "assist" a partner with the planning and preparation of
dissolution documents and tax returns so long as the partner
is the one who officially executes the actions.

Based on the usual size of an investment club, I don't
believe performing the full withdrawal of all partners at
once is that burdensome. However, when the withdrawals are
in the latter part of the year, I would plan a final shut
down about 15-20 December so I will receive the 1099s from
the broker before the Partnership tax return is due. But if
some partners want out sooner, I would complete their final
withdrawal in accordance with the timing in your partnership
agreement. However, I would make a deal with at least one
partner to remain until December so the two of us still
constitute a partnership.

I am sure lots of clubs have shut down during the year and
filled a short-year final tax return without issues, so
waiting for December is just me when there have been many
transactions and there is the possibility for disbursements
to shareholders to be reclassified from non-qualified to
qualified dividends or to return of capital if the company
has insufficient income to treat the disbursement as a
dividend. Having the 1099s in hand when completing the tax
returns just reduces the chances of having to file amended
returns.

Cheers, Jack
I have been convinced to not do partial withdrawals for some
members. If we have members go out 2-3 at a time, taking
mostly stock shares, will these members still share the tax
burden when the K-1's are completed in 2026? i.e. Does the
order matter if some take stock and some take all cash?
Maybe the software figures this all out? We don't want the
treasurer overwhelmed.
The simple answer is that the software figures everything out. In the final year of any members' tenure in the club, their total capital gain will consist of the gains reported on their final K-1 and the gain reported on their withdrawal report. Regardless of the order of processing the withdrawals, the total capital gain for any single member will always be constant. Changing the order of processing may move some of the capital gain between the K-1 and the withdrawal report, depending on the timing of any stock sales relative to the withdrawal processing date. If you submit your question to support@bivio.com, they will provide you with a fuller explanation.

Ira Smilovitz

On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 3:03 PM Barbara Preneta via bivio.com <user*28224800001@bivio.com> wrote:
I have been convinced to not do partial withdrawals for some
members. If we have members go out 2-3 at a time, taking
mostly stock shares, will these members still share the tax
burden when the K-1's are completed in 2026? i.e. Does the
order matter if some take stock and some take all cash?
Maybe the software figures this all out? We don't want the
treasurer overwhelmed.
Sharon:

Your concern is easily avoided. Sell or transfer any
security scheduled to pay its dividend in January before the
ex-dividend date. When you complete the final transfers to
complete the dissolution, transfer remaining cash via ACH or
checks issued by the broker so all accounts are closed in
December and cannot accrue interest payable in January.

Dissolving earlier in the year and filing a partial year tax
return without the benefit of the 1099s runs the risk of
having to file an amended return. Your choice of which risk
you feel more comfortable assuming.

Cheers, Jack
Ira:
Please confirm the accuracy of the following:

If the partnership is being dissolved by the withdrawal of
all partners, there is no reason to transfer stock. Provided
all appreciated stock lots owned by the club are long term,
having the club sell them and divvying up the tax burden
through the K-1 is the same result to the partners as
thorough the withdrawal report. Transferring stock
classified as short-term gain causes the gain to be
long-term based on the holding period of the receiving
partner in the partnership. I am not sure whether the
stepped-up basis carries over the partnership's holding
period or starts a new one.

Transferring appreciated stock is appropriate only when less
than all partners are departing in the same year so that
partners remaining for future years are not subject to
capital gains on the stock that otherwise would be sold to
raise cash in the year the other partners leave.

Cheers, Jack
Jack,

Transferring appreciated stock is always an appropriate approach, regardless of the number of members withdrawing. The logic of your first paragraph is accurate, assuming that the withdrawing members will immediately sell any shares they receive. In that scenario, you are correct that the only effect is to shift the capital gains between the K-1 and the withdrawal report, specifically to the sale of the received shares immediately after receipt. The cost basis adjustments on the withdrawal report ensure that the member only pays capital gains tax on their actual share of the gains in the stock received and their share of the gains from all other stocks distributed to other members.

However, the withdrawing member can decide to retain the shares received, thereby deferring tax until a future year when they sell the shares. This can be done at once or spread over time, whatever best suits their tax planning strategy. Selling the shares before processing the withdrawals forces the members to recognize the gain this year.

As an aside, I believe that the holding period of any stocks received includes any holding period of the club in those shares, regardless of the member's time of tenure in the club.

Ira Smilovitz


On Sun, Jul 20, 2025 at 5:48 PM John W Ranby Trustee PGM Cariboo Trust via bivio.com <user*15792700001@bivio.com> wrote:
Ira:
Please confirm the accuracy of the following:

If the partnership is being dissolved by the withdrawal of
all partners, there is no reason to transfer stock. Provided
all appreciated stock lots owned by the club are long term,
having the club sell them and divvying up the tax burden
through the K-1 is the same result to the partners as
thorough the withdrawal report. Transferring stock
classified as short-term gain causes the gain to be
long-term based on the holding period of the receiving
partner in the partnership. I am not sure whether the
stepped-up basis carries over the partnership's holding
period or starts a new one.

Transferring appreciated stock is appropriate only when less
than all partners are departing in the same year so that
partners remaining for future years are not subject to
capital gains on the stock that otherwise would be sold to
raise cash in the year the other partners leave.

Cheers, Jack